well, dang, it isn't for a lack of your trying to educate them!! I see you making reference to these quite often, especially locally and in apprenticeships, and i had presumed quite a bit online sufficient that people might get the idea. I wonder, comparably, whether Hyatt is an easy target because he is not about to be defended by academics, isn't alive to receive support from his family or friends, and the owner of the copyright is either in dispute or (UCLA) doesn't seem too terribly worried about getting it out there and supporting it.catherineyronwode wrote:...Why single {HMHyatt} out for ridicule?
I believe that this has occurred because, as they themselves make apparent, these White authors are not very familiar with earlier collections of Black folklore, either academic or anecdotal; they are not engaged in primary exploration of present day Black culture; and they are unfamiliar with alternative, non-academically-mediated sources of historical Black folk-magic information, such as the WPA Slave Narratives and the texts of 1920s-1930s blues lyrics.
goodness, thereby denying the reality of an extant culture (because they have no lasting interest in participating in it themselves, only displacing it like orientalism or exotic appropriation)? you don't think the form (phonetics) has something to do with it too? (untrustworthy because it isn't in plain English?)catherineyronwode wrote:To them, it may have seemed that Hyatt was publishing Southern folklore, but identifying it as "Negro" and including within it things unfamiliar to them, not of "[THEIR] heritage," which, therefore seemed untenable to them. They believe Hyatt to be the ultimate African American hoodoo folklore collector, since they know no others. By discrediting his work and impugning the veracity of his interviewees, they may think they can stop up the free flow of information about African American culture and make themselves the gatekeeper-interpreters of all Southern folk-magic.
is this in any way related to 'granny magic'? I'm familiar with the appeal to previous generations and the 'famtrad' (I made fun of it in creating the File of Alt.Magick.Tyagi Rules and Assorted Dogma (FAMTRAD)), but have no idea if these two things have an intersection - redundantly self-supporting the Appalachian Granny Magic trad by connection to my granny!catherineyronwode wrote:Furthermore, by denying their reliance on written texts that describe specifically BLACK folklore, they can become the inheritors of their own WHITE "grandmother stories," to quote Chas Clifton's term. (For those following this discussion in later years, see Clifton's 2006 book "Her Hidden Children," especially Chapter 5, on "self-invention.")
quite so. we might ask what there is to be gained as well by mixing up Yoruban West African religion with Congo reilgion and African American Protestantism. surely people get a charge out of 'being right and informing the ignorant of the proper sinews of knowledge heretofore misunderstood'.catherineyronwode wrote:Of course Hyatt's work is the largest collection of African American folk-magic ever assembled, but academics function in the world of scientific method. They do not calculate a source's value by its size alone, but also ask, "Can this data by independently confirmed?" And in Hyatt's case, it can be. ...To discredit Hyatt's 1,605 African American informants as "a dangerous crock" (direct quote) accomplishes nothing in the end....
not only that, we've seen other scenarios of conspiracy theory surrounding Hyatt by academic quadrants, with UCLA sinking the project to get the information out there and accessible to folks. a few visitors to the shop voiced the obvious "common sense" (? I don't always trust common sense!) notion that the powers that be with leverage saw an advantage in keeping African Americans from learning about their own remnant culture and thereby enabling their self-empowerment, fractionated by abduction though it was. was omission of the Jewish component to this picture by Hyatt (in his dismissal of merchant and pharmaceutical contributions) continued by those besides you who have been attempting to analyze the picture? I don't want to shift to the hypothesis of a conspiracy theory if i can avoid it, but i know why you say that.catherineyronwode wrote:Ultimately, given the number of independent data points collected by Hyatt in so many cities for so many years, the attempt to categorize the material as "foolishness" (direct quote) takes on the tone of a conspiracy theory ....You see where this logic leads?
did missionaries returning from deepest darkest Africa or the jungles of South America with tales of amazing peoples and animals receive dismissals from those back in their home town upon their return? it seems somewhat likely. were they to present sound cylinders having recorded those animals and jungle denizens would this evidence seem convincing to listeners? remnant transcription? in today's world, where so much relies upon the media format and accessibility of data presented to the viewing audience, perhaps phonetic transcriptions just seem like a weak prop to those used to reality television shows where 'common sense' notions lead them to dismiss 'outrageous' expressions plainly located outside their ken. maybe we need a 'Techno-Hyatt', with a camcorder and a built-in microphone, to wander all over the South and collect up 1600 more interviews, uploading them to Youtube or the Library of Congress!
